Monday, January 26, 2015

Wikis. Yes or no?

A wiki is a website that allows collaboration among a particular audience. Members of the wiki can edit the content and arrangement of the information. Wikis are free, powerful, flexible, and call for collaboration. Wikis can also assist in classroom organization for assignments and other documents that need to be submitted.

Depending upon the wiki usage and audience, I could see students collaborating within Wiki on topics geared towards media, books, and technology. Students in the fourth and fifth grade would benefit from this form of collaboration due to being able to work on their keyboarding skills, critiquing the reasoning of others, and building their research skills.

I believe that the most effective way to use the wiki in an elementary school level would be to allow students to summarize and review texts they have read and then discuss it on the wiki. During this collaboration students can analyze text and critique other students’ summaries on the same text. Students can also make connections to the text by providing additional information linking others to author sites, setting locations and facts, and any additional information that takes the students beyond the text.

Students in middle or high would also benefit from working within a wiki to collaborate on book or technology reviews, however, I do believe that older students would be able to experience a wiki at a deeper level. I particularly like Ben Miller’s educational wiki that was a runner up for the Edublog Awards 2009: http://hums3001.unsw.wikispaces.net High school students could do as Mr. Miller’s students and create a wiki based upon the knowledge gained from a particular course or topic. Students could utilize the media center and research topic based upon Common Core Standards. Mr. Miller’s section titled, “Wiki Spirit” reminds students about remaining neutral when writing, to be bold, the importance of diversity, and to not get upset when some edits your work. All wikis need to have some form of piece similar to Mr. Miller’s.

There are several drawbacks with using a wiki. Wikis are time consuming, could contain incorrect information, and need to be monitored frequently. Wikis are time consuming due to having to monitor the information that is posted and edited. Accidental deleting of information can also occur during the editing process; which results in frustration from the creators. I did not care for the AHS Media Center wiki: http://ahsmedia.barrow.wikispaces.net
I found it to be filled with information from the media specialist and not from the students. The wiki appeared to be more of a website for the media center rather than a collaboration of ideas and knowledge.

As stated, Wikis are advertised as a collaboration tool that students can use, however, I noticed that some wikis are just used as a ‘storage cabinet’ for student work. There does not seem to be any form of collaboration when you are just uploading work or documents into a site. In order for the wiki to be active spaces for collaboration, several elements need to be present. Students need to be able to have access to the edit button, guidelines for editing/critiquing should be visual to all students, and the purpose of the wiki should also be present. The wiki should also promote students to want to change other’s opinions and ideas. It should create open discussion among peers.





Thursday, January 22, 2015

What are your thoughts about using Wikis in the Media Center? How can they be used most effectively? Are there drawbacks to Wikis?

As you perused the Wikis in the readings above, did you find uses you thought particularly strong? Particularly weak?

While Wikis are touted as collaborative tools, many seem to be passive "storage cabinets." What elements need to be present to move them toward being active spaces for collaboration?



I do not see using a specific media center wiki for students unless it is for reading bowl activities or some other focus groups.  On the flip side- a teacher-lead wiki could used for media center collaborative projects ideas and student presentation/research projects and information in regard to curriculum and lesson planning. The wiki would not have to be edited independently but could be used as an open source note taking device when lesson planning with other teachers.

The SLMS can create a media center wiki that could be more dynamic in nature that the standard static library web page.  Media center updates-the calendar-collection additions and book highlights/reviews could be added to the wiki in lieu of teacher emails or a newsletter.

In my opinion, wiki's work best for short term projects unless the particular wiki is well marketed/advertised (such as wikipedia) it will remain static. Even the library-centric wiki "libsuccess.org" which I looked over for this bloge entry has not recently updated and much of the information is our of date or links are no longer in use. The format of the wiki is very bland and reads like a list of links. the Apalachee HS Media Center wiki is also very bland and out of date-- It has a sloppy appearance and to view news and updatesa ws awkward and not easily apparent.

I also feel the  lack of ownership can be one reason that wikis can fail. One person creates the wiki template and hopes the community at large or a preselected group will provide the content. If the core information and overall look is not in place- such that users are drawn to the wiki on its own merit- then the wiki will continue to grow slowly or not at all.